首页> 外文OA文献 >Intrathoracic application of a vacuum-assisted closure device in managing pleural space infection after lung resection : is it an option?
【2h】

Intrathoracic application of a vacuum-assisted closure device in managing pleural space infection after lung resection : is it an option?

机译:胸腔内应用真空辅助闭合装置处理肺切除术后胸膜腔感染:是否可以选择?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Empyema after lung resection is a challenging condition to manage and is associated with a high mortality. Intrathoracic application of a vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) device is recently introduced as an adjunct in the management of this condition. A best evidence topic was constructed to address whether this approach is effective in successful chest closure and reducing hospital stay. Twenty-three papers were found using the reported search, of which nine papers were identified that provided the best evidence to answer the question. All papers were retrospective and included a total of 69 patients treated with intrathoracic VAC. There was only one cohort study and the rest were either case series or case reports. In a cohort of 19 patients reported by Palmen et al. the average duration of an open window thoracostomy in a group of patients with VAC (n = 11) was 39 ± 17 days and in those without VAC (n = 8) was 933 ± 1422 days. Median length of VAC treatment was 22 days (range 6-66 days) in a series of 28 patients reported by Saadi et al. Some authors excluded patients with a bronchopleural fistula (BPF) from VAC treatment. However, Groetzner et al. have safely used VAC in patients with BPF after covering the bronchus stump with an intrathoracic muscle flap. The mediastinum and the bronchus can be covered using a polyvinyl-alcohol foam. Polyurethane foam is commonly used to fill the intrathoracic cavity up to the superficial wound. The suggested starting level of negative pressure is as low as -25 mmHg to -75 mmHg depending on the presence or absence of signs of mediastinal traction; this negative pressure can gradually be increased to -125 mmHg over time. The recommended interval between VAC changes is two to five days. Accumulated evidence in this article, although limited, suggests that VAC, as an adjunct to the standard treatment, can potentially alleviate the morbidity and decrease hospital stay in patients with empyema after lung resection. VAC can reduce inpatient length of treatment and can make the condition manageable in an outpatient setting. These results are yet to be proven by larger studies and clinical trials.
机译:肺切除术后脓胸是一个具有挑战性的疾病,并且死亡率高。胸腔内应用真空辅助封闭(VAC)装置是辅助治疗这种情况的工具。构建了一个最佳证据主题,以解决此方法是否对成功闭合胸腔和减少住院时间有效。使用所报告的搜索发现23篇论文,其中9篇被认为是回答问题的最佳证据。所有的论文都是回顾性的,包括总共69例接受胸腔内VAC治疗的患者。仅有一项队列研究,其余为病例系列或病例报告。在Palmen等人报道的19名患者中。一组VAC患者(n = 11)的平均开窗开胸手术时间为39±17天,而没有VAC(n = 8)的患者为933±1422天。 Saadi等报道的28例患者中,VAC治疗的中位时间为22天(6-66天)。一些作者将患有支气管胸膜瘘(BPF)的患者排除在VAC治疗之外。但是,Groetzner等人。在用胸腔内肌皮瓣覆盖支气管残端后,已在BPF患者中安全使用VAC。纵隔和支气管可以用聚乙烯醇泡沫覆盖。聚氨酯泡沫通常用于填充胸腔直至浅表伤口。建议的负压起始水平低至-25 mmHg至-75 mmHg,具体取决于是否存在纵隔牵引的迹象。随着时间的推移,该负压可以逐渐增加到-125 mmHg。 VAC更改之间的建议间隔时间为两到五天。本文中的证据虽然有限,但表明VAC作为标准治疗的辅助手段,可以潜在地减轻肺切除术后脓胸患者的发病率并减少住院时间。 VAC可以减少住院病人的治疗时间,并可以在门诊环境中控制病情。这些结果尚待大型研究和临床试验证明。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号